Background
The Futures Dictionary has served as one of The Millennium Project’s signature reference works for more than a decade. Since 2016, we’ve sold roughly 70 copies ($3,500 total) — about one-third of them in just the past two years, likely due to renewed interest from our FRM 4.0 and AI-related projects.
That pattern suggests something important: the content still matters, but the printed format no longer fits how people learn, search, and share knowledge.
Proposal
Instead of a new print edition, I would like to explore how to make a possible Futures Dictionary 3.0 primarily a digital resource — interactive, searchable, and connected to other TMP platforms (GFIP, FRM 4.0, Real-Time Delphi).
Possible directions under discussion:
-
Open Reference Hub: freely accessible online dictionary with search and cross-links to FRM 4.0 methods.
-
Members-Only Perk: full access for registered Discourse users or TMP newsletter subscribers.
-
Hybrid Model: public preview of key terms, with advanced search and downloadable content for members or partners.
-
Interactive “Futures Terms Explorer”: searchable cards, related-method links, and optional Pol.is or mini-Delphi modules beside definitions for community feedback.
Each approach could make the dictionary a living, evolving reference rather than a static PDF.
Questions for the Community
-
What digital format would make the dictionary most useful for you (and your students, colleagues, or organizations)?
-
Should access be completely open, or should we reserve advanced features as paid content, or perhaps as incentives to participate in Pol.is surveys or RTDs?
-
What features would add the most value: keyword search, FRM cross-links, multilingual toggling, or interactive commenting?
-
How might your Node (or others) contribute entries, translations, or ongoing curation?
Quick Input
I’ve created a short Pol.is survey to gauge sentiment on these options.
Next Steps
After two weeks of discussion and Pol.is feedback, I’ll summarize preferred models and draft a low-cost implementation plan to present to the Board.
Your ideas will directly shape how TMP shares its foresight vocabulary with the world.
Please add your comments: What would make Futures Dictionary 3.0 a truly global, living resource?